
Seniors duped into buying living trusts...
Posted on 7/25/2010
Probate rules vary greatly from state to state...
Posted on 7/5/2010
Probate litigation no stranger to gay couples...
Posted on 4/25/2010
Estate tax repeal means some spouses are disinherited...
Posted on 1/2/2010
Estate taxes set to expire in 2010...
Posted on 12/19/2009
Probate lawyer under criminal investigation for taking money from estate...
Posted on 12/8/2009
Steve McNair's estate free to sell share of restaurant...
Posted on 11/24/2009
Trust mills fined over $6 million...
Posted on 11/1/2009
Katherine Jackson fires her probate attorney....
Posted on 10/23/2009
Yes, a bad father can luck into an inheritance...
Posted on 9/17/2009
A poorly drafted trust with an unusual stipulation nearly resulted in co-trustee and beneficiaryJack Brandt losing his inheritance.
A poorly drafted trust with an unusual stipulation nearly resulted in Jack Brandt losing his inheritance.
Riverside County police officer Jack Brandt and his three sisters were appointed co-trustees of their parent’s trust, with the understanding that each sibling would receive equal shares of the trust upon their parent’s deaths. However, after both parents passed away, Jack’s sisters relied on an unusual provision that appeared to allow for a majority rule for control of what happened inside the trust, thus shutting Jack out of every step of the process as a result. Upon recommendations from other attorneys, Jack contracted Scott Grossman for help.
When Jack’s sisters projected an unrealistic sales price for their parent’s primary residence in a declining market, Mr. Grossman filed a petition with the probate court to force the sale of the property at auction and allow for equal distribution of all of the estate’s property.
The judge subsequently ordered mediation prior to scheduling a trial date. By the time mediation took place, comps on the home indicated an $86,000 difference between the sister’s projected sales price and the actual value of the home.
Mediation took place and the parties successfully came to an agreement. The mediation agreement included the estate being responsible for paying Jack’s attorney fees and costs, as well as the parent’s residence being sold at auction providing Jack his equal share of the estate. A change in the trust’s majority rule provision was also agreed upon, resulting in all co-trustees receiving equal control of the trust.
As a police officer, Jack Brandt spent a great deal of time working with attorneys throughout his career, but found Scott Grossman to be a cut above the rest. Click on this link to hear about Jack’s experience in his own words:
For many years, everyone knew it was the intention of Leona Lusk to split her estate in equal shares among her four children, Terry Lusk’s father being one of them. However, Terry’s father died before Leona resulting in Terry and his siblings now being the benefactors of his father’s share of the estate. Picture their surprise when they learned after their grandmother’s death that a new estate plan was in place with a new sole beneficiary.
Further investigation exposed disturbing details
Terry’s family, being fully convinced of wrong doing, knew they had to hire an attorney to fight for their share of the inheritance.
"Scott bent over backwards and reached out to them [the other family members] numerous times to try to get them involved
It was discovered that prior to her death, Leona had been diagnosed with dementia.
Around that time, a neighbor became increasingly more involved in Leona’s life and began taking care of most of Leona’s day-to-day affairs. After a fall at home, Leona was taken to the hospital for treatment where she was diagnosed with dementia. However, the diagnosis was a bit uncertain – one stating she had mid-stage dementia and another stating late-stage dementia.Leona’s daughter, who lived locally, also become more involved in her mother’s life during this time and began taking on a more active role in Leona’s financial affairs – signing all the hospital documents and paying the hospital bills with Leona’s money. Less than a month later, she even went as far as to have Leona sign a Quit Claim Deed in an attempt to transfer Leona’s property over to her. Fortunately, the deed did was not recorded due to an error at the Register of Deed’s office.
It was at that time that Leona and her daughter met with an estate-planning attorney, where Leona requested that a new estate plan be drafted leaving everything to her daughter. However, her daughter failed to tell the attorney that Leona had been diagnosed with dementia, or of the existence of another estate plan.
During the trial, the new estate-planning attorney claimed Leona was fine and although she acknowledged the existence of the previous plan, could not recall the name of the attorney who had drafted the document. Unfortunately, he did not question the situation or investigate further. In addition, just one month after the new estate plan had been drafted Leona’s primary physician noticed symptoms of dementia and began prescribing anti-dementia medication. He too had not been informed of the hospital’s dementia diagnosis. However, during the trial stated he was not surprised Leona had been diagnosed.
Scott just did a great job. He was very professional, very prepared and he essentially won the case for us.
Scott stayed on his game the whole time and did a great job managing the family situation, which was probably harder than the actual case. "When we got to trial it was actually embarrassing for this other attorney,"said Terry. "Scott had all this stuff pulled together. Scott did all the work. He was really prepared. The other attorney didn’t do any of the work. He thought we didn’t have a case. But It was still a little bit of a crap shoot whether or not we would win," said Terry. "But in the end the Judge ruled in our favor."Nevertheless, it wasn’t over yet. There was still one more trial ahead for Terry and his brother before the case would be finished. "To make a long story short – the other attorney, after going through all of this and costing everyone a lot of time and money, finally ended up coming to us and just settling for what we wanted."
Terry Lusk, Arvada, Colorado
[This testimonial does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.]
Dear Scott:
Thank you so much for representing me in the probate of my mother's estate. When you took over my case from attorney Daniel Cooper my case was a mess. I was very upset with my attorney, couldn't talk with him and never felt like I got answers to my questions. I was at the end of my rope and desperately needed help with my case.
I felt immediate relief when we met for the first time. You explained my case to me, showed me what my former attorney had done wrong and got it corrected. You stood up for me when my sister threatened to sue me. When she actually sued me in the Hemet probate court and the probate litigation began you defended me against every allegation she made. You were the reason I won the litigation. You made sure I remained the administrator and showed the judge that I had done what I was supposed to do.
Maybe more importantly you answered all my questions and calmed me down when I got nervous and anxious. You told me from the beginning we would win the case and you were right. Every time I told you I was willing to give up my administrator's fees and even some of the cash I was supposed to get you told me not to do it. You told me everything would be alright. You were right.
Because of your efforts, skill and advice, I received clear title to my home and tens of thousands of dollars I was ready to give up. You gave me hope, guidance and support. You got my case on track and kept it there.
Some people think any attorney who says he does probate can handle their case. That's wrong. Having an attorney like you who focuses on probate and probate litigation is very, very important. I know because I had the wrong attorney and he screwed up my case. You were the right attorney and that made all the difference to make my case turn out right.
Thank you for all your help.
Yours truly,
Ronni Lynn Benjamin
[This testimonial does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.]
Begin your case review by filling out the form below:
The Grossman Law Firm, APC
6370 Magnolia Avenue
Suite 320
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 683-3704
Fax: (951) 683-3948
Toll Free: (866) 540-0000
Get Directions
Temecula Office
43537 Ridge Park Drive, Suite 101
Temecula, CA 92590
Phone: (951) 461-8874
Fax: (951) 683-3948
Toll Free: (866) 540-0000
Get Directions